Key Takeaways
- Joseph Delong, CTO of SushiSwap, has accused Optimism of giving preferential treatment to Uniswap.
- Delong believes that Optimism preferred Uniswap thanks to persuade from venture capital (VC) investors.
- Optimism has denied accusations of any preferential treatment.
SushiSwap CTO Joseph Delong has accused Optimism, a Layer 2 scaling mission, of giving preferential treatment to Uniswap.
SushiSwap CTO Speaks Out Against Optimism
Sushiswap and Uniswap are two of essentially the most attention-grabbing decentralized exchanges on Ethereum. As we affirm, which capacity of Ethereum’s scalability complications and excessive fuel funds, both exchanges had been exploring Layer 2 alternatives in instruct to manage with extra transactions.
This day, SushiSwap printed why it chose to make consume of Arbitrum over Optimism as a Layer 2 scaling resolution for its decentralized alternate.
SushiSwap CTO Joseph Delong claimed that Optimism gave preferential treatment to Uniswap despite claiming to be a neighborhood-pushed mission.
On Twitter, Delong acknowledged that Optimism hindered SushiSwap’s launch and pushed Uniswap to launch first. He acknowledged that SushiSwap had deployed its decentralized alternate on the Kovan testnet. SushiSwap used to be within the contrivance of debugging and deploying a final version when it used to be told Uniswap could presumably be given the opportunity as a replacement.
Describing SushiSwap’s dealings with Optimism and the draw in which it used to be modified into down by the mission, Delong acknowledged:
“After a prolonged discussion with heaps of dancing all over the premise we at final had to inquire of point smooth, “Are we going to be treated equally on deployment?” That’s when the team told us point smooth that Uniswap “had to whisk first”. Meaning we were boxed out of deployment unless Uniswap.”
Delong also told CryptoBriefing that SushiSwap had a call with Optimism sooner than the Uniswap launch and acknowledged that the two teams had agreed on implementation sooner than this interruption.
Then, SushiSwap decided to launch on Arbitrum as a replacement, which the mission considers a extra “honest” platform. The Arbitrum implementation has already long gone dwell. Meanwhile, Uniswap V3 used to be deployed to the Optimism mainnet in July.
Delong Acknowledged VCs Influenced the Decision
Speaking with CryptoBriefing, Delong acknowledged he believed Optimism preferred Uniswap thanks to persuade from the investors Andreesen Horowitz (a16z) and Paradigm. Each and each funds own made investments in Uniswap and Optimism, as well many different leading crypto projects. In line with Delong, the two VCs could honest own “colluded” to persuade and profit their vested projects.
Delong acknowledged that despite the reality that right here is the first time that this has took space to SushiSwap with a mission backed by Paradigm and a16z, equal cases own beforehand came about with different projects.
“This has took space twice earlier than, so this time we’re taking a stand. We disagree with Paradigm and a16z colluding with their portfolio projects for preferential treatment. We chose to be in contact out about Optimism to ship a message about collusionary habits within the DeFi location.”
Previously, a16z used to be accused of leveraging its impact all over the DeFi neighborhood when it allegedly delegated UNI tokens to vote for a Uniswap lobbying group known as the DeFi Education Fund. The fund used to be later slammed by DeFi enthusiasts for lack of transparency after it purchased half of of its Uniswap grant for $10 million.
Optimism Defends Itself
Many prominent figures within the DeFi location spoke in make stronger of Delong. DeFi Architect and founder Yearn Finance took to twitter, and acknowledged: “This occurs grand extra than of us accept as true with. DeFi isn’t very DeFi,” relating to Optimism’s preferential treatment in opposition to Uniswap.
Anthony Sassano, an Ethereum educator and investor, agreed and acknowledged he used to be “upset” to see the incident, earlier than alongside with “there’s no space on this ecosystem for walled gardens.”
In response, Optimism has denied the accusation of any preferential treatment, and claimed as a replacement that Uniswap used to be deployed first on myth of “they engaged with us 1.5 years ago, prolonged earlier than Sushiswap.” Optimism added that it used to be not “taking part in favorites” however following the “first in, first out” precept. The team now plans on whitelisting projects “as rapid as seemingly.”
