Here’s a recording of a most up-to-date Twitter Areas conversation about BIP119 (OP_CTV). Whereas you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably like to put up an view about BIP119, please electronic mail Bitcoin Magazine.
Listen To The Conversation Here:
Transcript
[0:06] Casey Rodarmor: –BIP repository and they’ll query that a BIP quantity be assigned. If the proposal is earn of coherent and linked to Bitcoin, the BIP editor will effect a BIP quantity and moreover would possibly per chance presumably well presumably build requests for making improvements to or build the checklist more sure, after which the checklist will most seemingly be assigned a BIP quantity and the pull query will most seemingly be merged into the repo.
I hold the largest thing for folks to construct in thoughts when they’re fervent with what’s the BIP is to trusty preserve in thoughts that here is never any longer a proper process for what’s accredited and applied in Bitcoin. Whereas you advance up with trusty an completely knuckle-draggingly moronic view for Bitcoin, and or no longer it is fairly effectively-formed, you are going to procure a scheme to coach for a BIP quantity. And if or no longer it is linked to Bitcoin and or no longer it is effectively-formed, the editor will effect it a BIP quantity and add it to the repository. It would now not mean that somebody is going to place in power it. It would now not mean that or no longer it is miles a factual view. It’s trusty a proper process that tips for adjustments to Bitcoin battle via earlier than they’re with out a doubt applied by somebody.
The principle reason is so as that when folks sail to place in power a switch, they’ll add it to Bitcoin core, presumably wallets are going to enhance it, then everybody knows, earn of, what the switch is and what it comprises. Does it build sense?
[1:44] Impress Goodwin: Yeah, I hold that used to be a truly factual explanation. It’s slightly a few sense to me.
[1:47] Casey: Fun Truth: whereas you sail aid to BIP 1, the first BIP, which describes the BIP process, it used to be proposed by Amir Taaki, who’s everybody’s favorite modern anarchist. I hold he took up palms and went to fight in Rojava and Syria, so as that’s slightly of deep reduce from Bitcoins history.
There is one thing else that folks have to be taught about BIPs, which is that they scheme no longer earn assigned an direct. It would now not sail BIP-1, 2, 3, 4, they earn assigned in conserving with a subject home. And I scheme no longer endure in thoughts what your entire areas are but, as an illustration, I know that the drive chain proposal, I hold these had been care for BIP-100, BIP-101, BIP-102, and I couldn’t suppose you what the other topic areas are, but trusty preserve in thoughts that BIPs are no longer assigned sequentially. So, or no longer it is incredibly complex trying to determine which BIP used to be proposed, and in what direct.
[2:44] Impress: Bought you. So there will not be any ordinal system to BIPs.
[2:48] Casey: That’s upright. Yeah.
[2:49] Impress: Roger that. All upright. Effectively, then let’s earn into this grunt one. So what’s BIP-119 or in another case identified as OP_CTV.
[3:02] Casey: Yep. So, whereas you earn cash in Bitcoin, you scheme no longer earn some steadiness which is care for a quantity that goes up and down. You would possibly per chance presumably well additionally just earn a space of some quantity of outputs that you preserve a watch on and an output has some cost in satoshis and it moreover has spending prerequisites, the must haves below which that output will also be spent. The spending prerequisites are encoded in one thing called Bitcoin Script, which is a slightly straightforward programming language. If somebody’s familiar, or no longer it is very identical to either fourth or PostScript. It’s a slightly straightforward, stack-based mostly entirely programming language and you are going to procure a scheme to exhaust a script to encode the must haves below which an output will also be spent.
So, one among potentially the most straightforward kinds of a condition is the transaction that spends this output will earn to be signed by this public key. And so whereas you earn a customary earn of vanilla wallet, your wallet is going to handle a bunch of outputs which are encumbered by a spending condition expressed in Script, which says that they can handiest be spent if a signature that fits your public key is equipped so no person can exhaust them but you.
Bitcoin has a bunch of unused opcodes, so these are things that for the time being scheme nothing, and they’re reserved for future extensions to the protocol. So, sooner or later attending to BIP-119, what BIP-119 does is it redefines one among these opcodes that does nothing, and it infrequently says, bewitch the transaction that is care for below consideration and hash definite ingredients of it. Issues care for the direct and worth of the inputs, which inputs are primitive, the lock time, the outputs, who the outputs are being spent to, or care for what the locking prerequisites of the outputs are etcetera. So, it takes potentially the most up-to-date transaction and it takes all these bits of it and hashes it, after which it requires that that hash match some pre-reward, some hash that’s been encoded in the spending script.
So, here is a truly refined methodology of asserting it, but infrequently, it says that the transaction that spends this output will have to earn a definite earn, as an illustration, which cash it spends– sorry, cash and outputs, on this case, are synonymous. Which outputs it spends, which outputs it creates, and the scheme in which it allocates satoshis between these a model of outputs. The name OP_CTV stands for OP, which is operation or opcode and CTV is Test Template Test. I neglect whether overview or overview. In overall, or no longer it is called Test-Test because of it checks the condition and fails the script if that condition is never any longer met and or no longer it is called Template which capability earn of combination of properties of the transaction that it commits to is truly a template for a transaction asserting this pending transaction will earn to be made in conserving with this template, in another case, you cannot exhaust this coin. Does that build sense?
[6:38] Impress: Yeah, completely. So, presumably one among these templates you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably name a covenant presumably?
[6:45] Casey: That’s upright. Yeah, that’s upright. Yeah.
[6:48] Impress: So, let’s earn into that slightly of bit and I know Jeremy trusty joined, which is superior. Hiya, Jeremy. Thanks for joining us. We’re going over the very basics so truly feel free to soar in and honest us at any point. Nevertheless, yeah, let’s earn into what our covenants are, Casey, and the scheme in which it pertains to that earn of template restriction model you is more seemingly to be earn of talking about.
[7:06] Casey: Yep. So, I mean, I am the exhaust of the word Template but you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably moreover converse that or no longer it is miles a covenant. I roughly care for the word Template because of or no longer it is slightly of bit more friendly and, to me, no lower than, or no longer it is slightly of bit more evocative of what the opcode is truly doing. Nevertheless I hold we will earn to restrict ourselves to talking about covenants, so, yeah, a covenant is some restriction that is placed on some cash. So, a slightly straightforward covenant is the earn of spending condition that I described earlier than. The attach, as an illustration, you are going to procure a scheme to handiest exhaust whereas you provide a signature, with some public key. That’s care for a slightly straightforward covenant, upright? It restricts how this coin also can just be spent. And OP_CTV creates these transaction template covenants the attach it restricts other properties of the transaction.
Correct to supply a concrete instance of why you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably desire this, I hold the classic covenant instance that is primitive for OP_CTV is that of a vault, so you earn a bunch of cash, you scheme no longer desire any individual to steal these cash, but you scheme will earn to earn the ability to exhaust them. So, you ship them into a vault and you exhaust OP_CTV in the spending condition for the vault outputs that you build and the spending condition is that these cash, if you broadcast one thing care for a spending transaction, you are going to procure a scheme to ship these cash or let me converse this higher – you are going to procure a scheme to either ship these cash to a hot wallet after a whereas out, care for two weeks, or there’s an quite quite loads of transaction that sends these cash to a frigid wallet.
And so the view is that the cash are in the vault and you are going to procure a scheme to movement them to your spending wallet, then again or no longer it would bewitch a whereas and at any time whereas they’re difficult to your spending wallet, you are going to procure a scheme to, earn of, claw them aid into frigid storage. And the view is you is more seemingly to be walking around alongside with your spending wallet, you scheme a withdrawal from the vault to your spending wallet, but then it gets stolen by an attacker or malware, with out reference to. And so, you earn time to broadcast this alternate transaction that strikes the cash aid to your frigid storage, which is care for somewhere that you have faith you studied is going to be valid. So, this gives you the benefit that you are going to procure a scheme to earn your funds out, and as prolonged as your hot wallet is never any longer compromised or you earn per week or two to broadcast this other transaction, your funds are going to be valid.
[9:49] Customer 1: Hello, Casey, scheme you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably like to swiftly outline how that differs from Youngster-Pays-For-Guardian or Replaced-By-Payment?
[9:58] Casey: Oh, positive. Yeah. So, Youngster-Pays-For-Guardian and Replaced-By-Payment are both ways to replace transactions in the mempool earlier than they’ve been mined by miners. So, there are strategies to incentivize the miners to contain one transaction over another. In some cases, they’ll also be primitive to earn of ruin one thing that you scheme no longer will earn to be mined from being mined then again or no longer it is an supply to the miners. It would now not restrict them in phrases of what as well they can just scheme. So, on this case, yeah, you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably exhaust either one to earn of try and redirect funds, IE, much like you build a inferior transaction, presumably you build another transaction that makes exhaust of RBF to scheme what you desire then again or no longer it is no longer enforceable. And then, if this inferior transaction that you are going to care for no longer to earn mined is growing an output that an attacker controls, then they can moreover exhaust RBF and Youngster-Pays-For-Guardian to bewitch a gaze at to earn the cash to themselves. So, you and the attacker will earn of both be bidding to bewitch a gaze at to earn the minor to mine the transaction that you wanted. It’s roughly identical then again it would now not truly provide arduous ensures.
[11:21] Shinobi: Hello, Casey, precise fleet and honest me if I misheard this, I am roughly eating upright now. Nevertheless I hold I heard you check with care for a customary, care for script pov or care for a public key script, care for trusty a passe output encumbrance as a covenant. I truly would no longer preserve in thoughts any earn of Bitcoin script a covenant, except these encumbrance prerequisites are applied to future transactions. Because trusty facing the output that exists now that allows it to be freely spent, I’d no longer definitionally name that a covenant. The entire belief of a covenant is that or no longer it is limiting the prolonged shuffle spending prerequisites whereas you sail to exhaust the reward output. And in a customary public key script, you wish to meet the condition of offering a signature that fits that pov key and verifies but you are going to procure a scheme to freely exhaust it in every single attach.
The entire belief of a covenant is that whereas you meet another spending condition, there are aloof restrictions limiting the attach you are going to procure a scheme to exhaust it.
[12:35] Casey: That seems entirely reasonable to me. I scheme no longer hold I’ve belief about what the precise definition of a covenant is, but I will with out a doubt glimpse the attach you is more seemingly to be coming from. Correct? It’s care for a customary Bitcoin Script determines the scheme in which it would also be unlocked after which a covenant says what you are going to procure a scheme to scheme with it from there.
[13:02] Shinobi: Exactly. Yeah.
[13:05] Casey: Yep. That’s a entirely shapely definition that I am completely happy with.
[13:08] Impress: Talking in that subject upright there, one among the recurrently-talked about beneficial properties of OP_CTV is the time-locked release of funds with an instance, earn of being care for first and principal of the month for hire, you are going to procure a scheme to earn a space amount of satoshis sent to an accessible wallet, which gives you the ability to aloof earn admission to whereas you’d like it knowingly but then moreover– [crosstalk]
[13:36] Casey: Jeremy, I hold your connection is roughly inferior.
[13:39] Shinobi: I am sorry. Robotic Jeremy, can you put weird and wonderful Jeremy on the cellphone with us?
[13:45] Impress: Bummer. Effectively, trusty to roughly cease what I was asserting. The ask there – how does this work, and why would a person pay the charge to scheme a transaction on this methodology to earn of restrict the amount of contact to their frigid storage wallet? Why is this advantageous? Why would this be a feature primitive?
[14:10] Casey: So, one nice thing about this OP_CTV vault construction is that they scheme no longer have to earn their frigid wallet on-line. In the customary course of things, a frigid wallet stays offline, would now not have to signal any transactions, and handiest in the emergency case scheme they have to raise their frigid wallet on-line and signal transactions. So, that’s expansive. Your frigid wallet will also be trim inconvenient. It would also be spread below rocks in six a model of nationwide parks or with out reference to and trim valid and you are going to procure a scheme to, yeah, trusty exhaust your Bitcoin more very with out problems in a more valid methodology.
[14:48] Impress: One of many other distinguished talk about beneficial properties is earn of lovingly known as care for, congestion preserve a watch on, earn of, charge market throttle mechanism that allows for distributing evenly in block home charges. How exactly does OP_CTV enable this to happen and build it accessible? And why would this be a factual thing? Why would we desire this even charge market?
[15:18] Casey: Correct. The classic instance is you earn an commerce and you’ve got a entire bunch of customers who earn cash on the commerce and they have to construct a withdrawal and they scheme no longer truly truly care or they’ve various levels of sensitivity in phrases of when they need these cash to be spendable by them. Nevertheless what they all desire is they have to construct positive that the cash will most seemingly be spendable by them by hook or by crook. Love, earlier than the withdrawal takes situation, they’re trusting the commerce to process the withdrawal. So, in situation of ready but let’s converse, moreover, dwelling is proscribed and charges on the blockchain are very high.
So, how OP_CTV can aid is the commerce can build a single very cramped transaction, that makes exhaust of an OP_CTV spending condition, and that transaction is broadcast and mined straight away with a slightly high charge rate, and that transaction the exhaust of OP_CTV earn of commits to amplify into one or more transactions that truly pay out all of the prospects. So, imagine, there are a thousand prospects, they all desire one Bitcoin off of the commerce, the commerce makes this one transaction that would possibly per chance pay a thousand Bitcoin to every of these thousand customers, then again it would now not truly build these outputs but. It trusty commits to growing them in the prolonged shuffle and the encourage of doing here is that this preliminary transaction that commits to paying your entire customers is amazingly cramped.
And so, the commerce will pay a slightly high charge rate to earn that transaction mined straight away, and once that transaction is mined, there’s aloof another transaction that wants to be broadcast for the customers to truly earn these funds spendable in their possess wallet, but these transactions no longer are counting on the commerce. You no longer desire to have faith the commerce that these transactions will happen. The preliminary transaction that used to be mined commits to all of these transactions. So, these transactions can happen later as customers desire them and anticipate a lower charge rate duration to earn these transactions mined.
[17:41] Customer 2: So, trusty to elaborate precise fleet, whereas now we now earn got infrequently two kinds or lessons of transactions, care for in the reminiscence pool, after which confirmed, this would possibly per chance possibly add a entire new class to the mempool which would possibly per chance possibly presumably well presumably be these dedicated [inaudible] is that upright?
[18:03] Casey: Yeah, earn of. It would now not truly add them. You would possibly per chance no longer converse that it provides this class of dedicated transactions to the mempool because of transactions are dedicated, they’re mined, and they’re no longer in the mempool anymore. Nevertheless, yeah, with out a doubt provides this third class transaction impart, which is this transaction is dedicated to be mined and it would also be mined each time somebody declares on an relevant template transaction that satisfies this.
[18:37] Jeremy Rubin: Effectively, I mean, Casey, I would possibly per chance presumably well presumably sail a step extra. It’s trusty assured to happen. Except that ordinary transaction is reorg out of the blockchain, it is actually no longer possible for the descending transactions to no longer by hook or by crook earn mined because of that in the initiate dedicated output is handiest spendable via these predefined transactions. So, as soon as that first one is confirmed and has a factual amount of work on top of it, all of these descending from it are completely assured to by hook or by crook verify because of by consensus, actually, no other transaction would possibly per chance presumably well presumably ever exhaust that confirmed output.
[19:21] Casey: So, assured trusty seems care for this type of stable word. As an illustration, any individual does aloof will earn to be conserving onto the spending transaction, upright? So, if the transaction that satisfies the template used to be misplaced and no person used to be storing it, then these transactions would by no methodology happen. So, I glimpse what you is more seemingly to be asserting, but care for, assured, man, assured is a terribly stable word.
[19:48] Jeremy: As as regards to assured as it is miles more seemingly to be. It’s more assured than a lightning channel impart in that you are going to procure a scheme to aloof try and double-exhaust a lightning channel with a model of states. Nevertheless whereas you is more seemingly to be the exhaust of CTV, there will not be any longer another exact methodology to exhaust.
[20:05] Impress: Hello, whereas you earn a UTXO, in frequent, how scheme you realize that you are going to procure a scheme to exhaust it?
[20:10] Casey: Is that this a rhetorical, philosophical ask? Pause you realize that you are going to procure a scheme to meet the must haves of the spending script?
[20:17] Impress: Yeah, but except you earn truly spent it, you scheme no longer know that you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably exhaust it.
[20:20] Casey: Because presumably there’s been some at ease work that you missed that switch the consensus tips?
[20:28] Impress: Obvious. I mean, yeah, there are numerous things that can happen or presumably you lose the principal in the prolonged shuffle, after which you cannot scheme it anymore. Per chance you is more seemingly to be asleep for a truly very prolonged time after which UTXO becomes truly neatly-liked and you scheme no longer endure in thoughts the attach your coin used to be or presumably your wallet gets corrupted after which you sail earn it from a backup and you scheme no longer earn potentially the most up-to-date new descriptors that had been derived earlier than your existence is backed up and now the cash’s gone. So, there are numerous things that can lead to points on this. And I hold or no longer it is one new class of one thing in a home of care for, slightly a few things that can happen care for that then again or no longer it is as assured as anything else whereas you earn the guidelines accessible to you on the time that you is more seemingly to earn the ability to estimate that you are going to procure a scheme to receive that fund in the prolonged shuffle.
[21:09] Casey: Yep. Yep. I mean or if it received insanely high, care for, charges trusty skyrocket and you is more seemingly to be by no methodology prepared to pay the costs to earn it mined.
[21:16] Impress: Yeah. And then how would you exhaust Bitcoin in the prolonged shuffle as effectively whereas you is more seemingly to be no longer prepared to exhaust the costs for it?
[21:21] Casey: Correct.
[21:22] [ads]
[23:20] Impress: Talking of the charge market dynamics here, I if truth be told can, presumably be a devil’s recommend here, glimpse why folks earn apprehension about any mechanism that seems to impress the charge market dynamics of Bitcoin. Pause you glimpse any methodology by which this earn of throttling mechanism would possibly per chance presumably well presumably negatively impact this pure market for block home? Is supply and quiz curve smoothing a factual thing for the open charge market of Bitcoin?
[23:48] Casey: I scheme no longer hold I earn a trim nuanced bewitch on this. It seems factual to me. It seems care for being in a position to tender that quiz and warding off spiky charges is factual. A more legit, less unstable charge rate seems factual so as that folks can conception forward higher, but I haven’t belief about it ample to hold that I earn a deep bewitch on this.
[24:22] Shinobi: I mean, in the simplistic case, Impress, whereas you exhaust one thing care for CTV and congestion preserve a watch on treaties, you’re roughly locking your self into a charge rate because of you is more seemingly to be committing to the precise hash of an precise transaction. And so as that charge rate has to be specified. So, on your entire transactions in a congestion preserve a watch on tree unfurling, that charge is locked in. The supreme methodology that you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably alter that would possibly per chance presumably well presumably be with care for Youngster-Pays-For-Guardian if one among the outputs of one among them used to be freely unencumbered to be spent wherever. Nevertheless to sail down slightly of bit of a rabbit hole, whereas you form CTV with Taproot, in principle, you earn a model of faucet tree spending paths that commit to a model of variations of a CTV congestion tree at a model of charge rates.
So, by hook or by crook, you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably either trusty earn this blob of transactions that every earn charge rates locked in that no topic the attach the highest charge used to be, they would possibly per chance presumably well presumably be in the same charge rate home of the mempool or whereas you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably like to sail down a crazy complexity rabbit hole, there would possibly per chance presumably well presumably be the aptitude to earn a model of faucet trees with a model of CTV paths and scripts so as that you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably roughly put up whichever ones you desire based mostly entirely on the charge you is more seemingly to be prepared to pay and what the mempool is taking a gaze care for on the time.
[25:57] Casey: I hold you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably moreover contain care for a cramped, somebody can exhaust output that any individual can exhaust to glue a Youngster-Pays-For-Guardian care for at every stage in the unfurling, fade slightly of dangling output that would possibly per chance additionally be primitive to bump the attain of a charge rate.
[26:15] Shinobi: In actuality, I had no longer belief about that earlier than upright now. Yeah, that would possibly per chance presumably well presumably be so much more straightforward. It’s no punch of varied faucet tree paths.
[26:23] Jeremy: And I hold one thing that’s well-known, too, is you are going to procure a scheme to play with the parameters on anything else care for that the attach you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably scheme, care for, let’s converse there are 10 branching components per node, so then the overhead of getting one-off upright output is slightly low. If or no longer it is 1 over 10.
[26:40] Impress: Variety of involving it seems to me that covenants are earn of restrictive by form and but, I hold there’s slightly a few trouble about expanding prerequisites with the new opcode citing these earn of unforeseen assault vectors. Pause you guys glimpse any validity to this that would possibly per chance presumably well presumably advance from such implementation?
[27:02] Jeremy: No, no longer with OP_CTV. With other covenant designs, there are possible worries of things you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably scheme care for earn cash eternally caught in some extra spending condition as well they can just by no methodology earn out of. Nevertheless with CTV, because of you wish to precisely outline an precise transaction sooner than time, or no longer it is roughly no longer possible to construct that frequent covenant that you are going to procure a scheme to by no methodology earn out of but folks can aloof exhaust cash around because of or no longer it is no longer much like you are going to procure a scheme to earn a CTV coin after which desire the attach to exhaust it. It’s already determined sooner than time the attach or no longer it can presumably well presumably be spent. So, there will not be any methodology to scheme uncommon things care for the covenant the attach the authorities has to signal off on every transaction you build and would possibly per chance presumably well’t direct it. That’s trusty no longer imaginable to scheme with CTV.
That’s personally one among the things that I care for approximately the proposal is or no longer it is so narrowly outlined and grunt that there will not be any anxiousness of that earn of thing being achieved with it.
[28:12] Casey: I hold or no longer it is moreover trusty charge underlining how straightforward OP_CTV is. It’s a truly, slightly straightforward opcode. It appears to be like like on the transaction that’s being processed, it hashes some bits of that transaction, after which it asserts that that hash is expounded to the hash that it received is expounded to some pre-reward hash. It’s no longer care for a earn of uncommon, arbitrary, natty contracting mechanism. It’s a truly extraordinarily straightforward scheme and I truly feel slightly confident that no longer handiest is it potentially priceless and potentially will also be primitive for the things that folks have to scheme with it, that’s care for one share, but moreover, let’s converse that there used to be one thing gross with it, then everybody would possibly per chance presumably well presumably trusty ignore it. Everybody would possibly per chance presumably well presumably trusty sail aid to no longer the exhaust of OP_CTV and your cash would no longer be efficient and no person can by some capability power you to accept an OP_CTV covenant that you didn’t signal in for.
Whereas you ship any individual an take care of, there will not be any methodology they can ship funds to that take care of and moreover encumber them with OP_CTV by some capability on the same time. So, or no longer it is very opt-in and if or no longer it is inferior, you are going to procure a scheme to trusty ignore it.
[29:33] Impress: Pause you have faith you studied roughly going off that, this would possibly per chance possibly presumably well presumably be a factual time to stipulate what a recursive covenant is versus no longer recursive covenant?
[29:44] Casey: Obvious. So, a recursive covenant is trusty a covenant that is recursive – no longer priceless the least bit. Recursive meaning that you are going to procure a scheme to converse, k, I earn this Covenant X after which whereas you are going to procure a scheme to meet the covenant, you are going to procure a scheme to scheme one thing, but then some or all of the cash have to then sail aid to Covenant X. So, the earn of classic upsetting instance of an rotten recursive covenant used to be, care for, the authorities publishes an take care of and says, every coin now has to be a multisig that entails this take care of and moreover everytime you exhaust from this type of multisig output, or no longer it is enforced in the covenant that the funds moreover desire to earn this malevolent authorities take care of as a cosigner to the output. So, the covenant can earn of ultimate indefinitely into the prolonged shuffle.
OP_CTV would now not enable this trusty by its very nature. An OP_CTV covenant can specify many steps into the prolonged shuffle then again it would’t specify an countless quantity of steps in the prolonged shuffle. After some sequence of transactions being mined, the OP_CTV covenant terminates. It will’t preserve a watch on what occurs extra down the road.
[31:09] Impress: Very frigid. I converse trusty to enable you to attain, we will wrap up the first half hour after which I hold we will earn to open it up and roughly discuss in regards to the BIP process.
[31:17] Casey: Correct sail ham, you realize.
[31:19] Impress: Yeah. I am hoping everybody’s sharpened their canines and their knives. No, trusty kidding. All luxuriate in here. Nevertheless for me, I hold one among the involving ingredients of this debate is earn of the ossification versus the necessity of invention and the attach we now earn got to sail if we’d like to aid, converse, five billion folks on the Bitcoin Network. So, how would possibly per chance presumably well presumably this BIP enable better numbers of customers to open batch channels for Layer Two solutions in a cramped amount of block home? How is this one thing that can aid us scale?
[31:57] Shinobi: Effectively, I was trusty getting my knife fascinating, Impress.
[32:01] Impress: Real. Real, Shinobi. Web ready.
[32:04] Shinobi: One of many finest shortcomings with lightning is the limitation on opening and shutting channels and there is trusty no methodology around that. If that bottleneck gets too trim, then lightning trusty hits a scaling ceiling. So, CTV can no longer– I mean, Jeremy can potentially spitball and earn into and aid with closing channels. Nevertheless as a ways as what he’s received written up and designed upright now, as well they can just completely aid open channels and or no longer it is actually trusty every thing about how a congestion preserve a watch on tree works, or no longer it is trusty the exhaust of that, other than on the tip of that tree unfurling and everybody sooner or later having unilateral preserve a watch on over their cash, they’re trusty Lightning channels, in situation of your entire cash winding up in a single sig take care of. And it normally is scheme more precious than trusty a customary withdrawal tree because of once that preliminary output is confirmed, you are going to procure a scheme to effectively treat these lightning channels as open and you are going to procure a scheme to exhaust them because of, by hook or by crook, that tree of transactions is going to unfurl, unchain, and all earn confirmed. And then these particular person UTXOs which are lightning channels will truly be confirmed on-chain.
And so, care for, there are aloof potentially, points, truly stressful shit, care for if your channel counterparty stops responding to you whereas you cannot sail close the channel except the tree starts or finishes unfurling. Nevertheless as prolonged as your channel counterparty is cooperative, the minute that first output in the initiate of that congestion preserve a watch on tree is confirmed to the depth that you require for a customary lightning channel, you are going to procure a scheme to treat all of the channels that that single output is committing to as open and you are going to procure a scheme to initiate the exhaust of them. So, it vastly will increase the scalability of onboarding folks onto the lightning community. And that, I hold, personally, is one among the finest advantages of CTV. That’s potentially the most productive, impactful exhaust case that I hold personally comes out of that.
[34:37] Impress: Pause you have faith you studied upright now, Shinobi, that Bitcoin would possibly per chance presumably well presumably service your entire world with out a additional opcode? Or I converse trusty extra model beyond trusty most up-to-date operational repairs?
[34:49] Shinobi: No. If Bitcoin iced over the attach it is upright now then the fact is 95% of folks on this planet are going to be the exhaust of custodians, they’re no longer going to earn the ability to resolve custody of their possess cash, and that’s the explanation trusty the cruel actuality. I hold that Bitcoin by hook or by crook does desire to ossify to be valid neutral cash, but when that occurs upright now, kiss your entire view of a full planet of folks self custodying their possess cash and facing things in a self-sovereign methodology goodbye.
[35:27] Impress: Yep. I mean, if folks earn priced out of predominant chain transactions that would possibly per chance completely happen, sadly. Effectively, no longer completely happen, but completely imaginable going on. All upright. Effectively, I converse, let’s open things up.
[35:42] Casey: Can I ramble for a minute about Bitcoin governance?
[35:45] Impress: Please.
[35:46] Shinobi: Can somebody ruin you?
[35:48] Casey: No, no person can ruin me. In actuality, they can. I am no longer a co-host. So, I hold or no longer it is trusty truly involving to talk about what’s Bitcoin’s governance process and or no longer it is very chaotic and if truth be told messy, and I hold that that is amazingly unparalleled a factual thing. Bitcoin trusty has all of these a model of stakeholders, it has customers, it has developers, it has miners, it has exchanges, it has companies and products, it has custody services, it has all styles of folks doing all styles of crazy things. The BIP process is roughly the supreme formal bit of governance that Bitcoin has and or no longer it is miles a truly extinct earn of governance. It’s no longer truly there to suppose somebody to scheme things. It’s trusty there to earn of suppose everybody the things that as well they can wish to scheme. And I hold that here is truly roughly factual.
Whereas you have faith you studied about any earn of formal process that you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably imagine for Bitcoin, some earn of vote or some earn of board, or some earn of miner balloting or proof of stake, unsuitable, with out reference to. Any individual of these processes is going to enshrine the ability to ramrod via a no longer expansive or a earn of contentious proposal if ample folks agree to it. The most up-to-date Bitcoin process which Jeremy is for the time being as much as his knees in is this very messy thing the attach you earn of desire to suppose your view and suppose why you have faith you studied or no longer it is miles a factual view, procure of us that have to exhaust it, suppose to them the scheme in which it would encourage them, put in power the code, write the spec, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Nevertheless on the tip of the day, there’s no person birthday party that can ram it via or no official entity that you are going to procure a scheme to attract, to construct your switch happen.
And so as that methodology that care for, yeah, you earn of desire to earn this sizable nebulous consensus of ample folks and ample stakeholders, and if somebody stakeholder, and by stakeholder, I scheme no longer mean participants. Nevertheless if somebody principal earn of neighborhood of Bitcoin pursuits, truly hates it, they can ruin it from going via to a level. And I hold here is de facto factual. Nevertheless one mission with it is we scheme glimpse the mission upright now the attach, no longer to editorialize, but I hold BIT-119 is expansive. I care for it. I hold or no longer it is straightforward. And there will not be any longer a transparent course for it to earn into Bitcoin, but that’s roughly because of there will not be any sure course for anything else to earn into Bitcoin. That’s k but, yeah, moreover received to take care of a few of the inconveniences that that poses. So, yeah, ramble over.
[38:40] Shinobi: Effectively, to acknowledge that with another ramble. Per chance the final six or seven years, here is how I’ve belief about how Bitcoin “governance” works. Bitcoin is trusty a mob. It’s actually a mob of folks for the time being engaged in a senseless thing in one course and in utter to interchange Bitcoin, you wish to rise up there and convince the mob to scheme one thing else with out getting skewered alive, yeah, and that’s the explanation trusty how that works. It’s total anarchy. Generally presumably beating your head on the wall for a truly very prolonged time convince the mob to scheme one thing, presumably most steadily you are going to procure a scheme to earn a cramped fraction of the mob to destroy off and sail earn another one, and most steadily you earn skewered alive.
[39:40] Customer 3: If I will also just interject there. I presumably to earn my thoughts because of it seems care for slightly a few the objections for the time being, I know we now earn got no longer truly talked about controversy on this talk about controversy, then again or no longer it is about technical consensus in the view that CTV would now not earn technical consensus.
[39:57] Casey: Yeah. I mean, the developers are moreover in the mob, upright? So, that is what technical convinces is. It’s care for talking to the mob of developers and trying to convince them what to scheme.
[40:09] Customer 3: Effectively, it seems care for the inference with the technical consensus is one thing that occurs earlier than person consensus, upright? Love, I mean, it seems from care for my studying between the traces with the many threads and telegram channels, I scheme no longer know whereas you guys would have faith that, but there appears to be like this overwhelming roughly advise from the roughly older neighborhood of developers that there wants to be some earn of technical consensus, after which there’s person consensus after which there’s that direct of operation and or no longer it is that direct of operations that’s particularly in violation here.
[40:39] Jeremy: Hold on. I am very definite that I had a technical consensus. I am very unsure what technical consensus is but I am very definite that I earn it for CTV and I hold that’s one thing that’s care for a uncommon situation to be in but there will not be any longer truly a rigorous definition of it. And there is moreover no longer truly a rigorous definition of what threshold to those items you is more seemingly to be supposed to be seeking and there are other events that topic instead of trusty care for developers determined and now or no longer it is one thing that’s ready to sail. One view that I desire to raise up is, in Judaism, whereas you is more seemingly to be doing a rabbinic tribunal to mirror if any individual will earn to be put to death, trusty slightly of bit care for a snug work, upright? If we’re deciding that we’re going to position the reward model of Bitcoin to death permanently and we’re gonna earn a brand new model of Bitcoin.
If one among the participants in that tribunal would now not converse that this person mustn’t be put to death, they earn to sail free because of every existence has some redeeming property that must happen. In the same methodology, every software program has some explanation why it truly must always not happen. If no person can advance up with a motive that’s compelling that it must always not happen, then potentially there’s too unparalleled groupthink, and we now earn got no longer achieved an precise job of completely evaluating this thing because of we all agree on the scheme in which it can presumably well presumably be. In actuality, most steadily descent methodology that folks earn put thorough belief into truly thinking in regards to the explanation why any individual would possibly per chance presumably well presumably no longer care for one thing, and whereas you glimpse too unparalleled consent, consent is never any longer consensus. It methodology, presumably there’s groupthink going on.
And when I evaluated CTV below this regard, what I saw used to be in all places in the board. The consultants who you furthermore mght can just have to consult with about this who earn truly spent the time fervent with this declare, all infrequently had in all places in the same line, which is, effectively, CTV seems k, then again or no longer it is roughly a subset of the things that I am in and I am no longer sure that the capabilities constructed on this will most seemingly be sufficiently involving for what I’d desire to create, upright? So, below that lens, no longer one among the consultants had an precise declare with CTV as an implementation. Any declare care for, oh, here is going to destroy this, or I hold this will earn a mission with some side of one thing else. It used to be trusty, “Oh, effectively, presumably I would possibly per chance presumably well presumably desire one thing else in a few years,” and that’s the explanation no longer rival with CTV.
That’s trusty care for, k, effectively, now, or no longer it is truly a ask now that this earn of technical consensus, which is a earn of acceptability has been reached, now, or no longer it is miles a ask of, effectively, is this one thing whereas you is more seemingly to be asserting no person wants to create on this, now, is this one thing folks have to create on? And if folks scheme have to create well-known things on it, then cowabunga, let’s sail. That’s technical consensus, let’s glimpse what the market wants. And what took situation, on this case, I hold, is a bunch of center supervisor technical consultants popped up asserting, “This would now not earn technical consensus. This would now not earn technical consensus,” with out even truly defining exactly what that methodology. And that is the explanation earn of the attach folks then received this view that there wasn’t a technical consensus in wish to truly making an just appropriate effort at evaluating what folks had truly evaluated and why I was studying technical consensus from the commentary of other of us which are obsessed on the technical dialogue as much as now.
[43:43] Shinobi: I mean, to create off that, Jeremy, what comes to my thoughts is your entire view of rough consensus from the IETF and your entire foundation of that has completely nothing to scheme with balloting or a model of of us that approve or disfavor. It’s fully about immense subject topic criticism and whether that criticism has been in a position to be addressed or no longer. And your entire belief is that – with out reference to how many or how few folks raised criticism of one thing, if that criticism has been truly addressed and shown to no longer be a exact criticism, then one thing is belief to be to earn a rough consensus. And I earn no longer seen any exact criticism towards CTV other than we can scheme higher. And if that’s your entire argument, effectively, then that brings up your entire ask of – effectively, how prolonged scheme we take a seat around and wait? How over and over can folks trusty pop up on the final 2nd, sail, here is one thing that is more seemingly to be higher and trusty preserve doing that without a ruin in sight earlier than we sail, “Here is ample.”
[44:59] Jeremy: Preserve on. Let’s trusty converse most weird and wonderful Bitcoiners had been towards and who cares about whoever’s potentially the most influential folks are, and even with out reference to technical consensus methodology. If most weird and wonderful Bitcoiners, of us that had gone on spaces, sail to Bitcoin meetups that you meet at a conference. what? We scheme no longer luxuriate in the view of, roughly, presumably or no longer it is frigid, presumably or no longer it is no longer. [crosstalk]
[45:32] Shinobi: Pause you have faith you studied that’s no longer a unfavorable? Pause you have faith you studied that’s trusty care for who cares or is that belief to be a unfavorable to you in the technique of consensus?
[45:39] Jeremy: I mean, infrequently, at that point, then they can build their sequence of what to shuffle or no longer to shuffle, and that’s the customers converse who’s never any longer a technical person that’s never any longer going to earn obsessed on critiquing these items. Love, I am sorry, dude. I primitive to be very sympathetic to that argument after Taproot, trusty no. Along with your entire hoo-ha about Taproot after which after it used to be activated, a entire lot of the participants I glimpse on this home earn no fucking clue the scheme in which it works, anything else about it. They had been trusty repeating advertising and marketing gross sales pitches care for nonsense with out any precise view of what it would scheme, what it would’t scheme, the scheme in which it truly works.
The actuality is most customers earn no fucking clue how any of this shit work or the technical actuality of it. They’ve their quite quite loads of, which is what to shuffle or no longer to shuffle.
[46:37] Pete Rizzo: So, is technical consensus, on your view, there will not be any declare, care for, there’s nothing gross with it or or no longer it is technical consensus that here is 100% factual because of it seems care for that’s all this mean, upright? Some folks hold consensus thinks, here is expansive, everybody loves it, and a few folks hold rough consensus is, there will not be any considerations. It sounds care for that is what you is more seemingly to be affirming, your guys’s definition.
[47:01] Jeremy: Effectively, I hold no lower than in as a ways as I will glimpse it, I stare the market in the frequent space of of us that exist on this dwelling is determining some earn of roadmap of what styles of methodology Bitcoin will earn to be difficult and I scheme no longer hold that is a thing that is in the fingers of developers who scheme technical consensus. I hold developers read what the market will earn to be looking and it requested for folks, care for how over and over earn you ever had a developer approached you and be care for, “Hello, how can Bitcoin resolve considerations for you? Love what’s no longer going on in Bitcoin upright now? And what are the points that you face that you truly feel are no longer things you are going to procure a scheme to resolve it the utility layer?” And in that earn of a thing that you read from the ecosystem after which developers assemble solutions for that and resolve if these solutions are ample for what the market wants.
I scheme no longer hold that or no longer it is miles a bunch of of us that jerk around all day and advance up with admire toys after which put them accessible on the market and glimpse if they scheme effectively. To me, you furthermore mght can just all agree on what the thing is to position out but truly slightly a few the technique is in discovering what the product consensus is, what folks need, and what’s going to truly resolve considerations after which determining whereas you are going to procure a scheme to ship an answer. It’s no longer about getting everybody on board with the thing they’re most thinking about.
[48:20] Customer 4: Yeah. So, Jeremy, I am queer. I am queer for you to have faith me on this. And Pete, this ties into your ask as effectively. So, I hold, on your definition of technical consensus versus product consensus, the road to me appears to be like technical consensus is – scheme we agree that this new switch does no hurt, upright? There is now not any downside that here is care for a shapely technique to a mission and that it with out a doubt would now not hurt and customers of the protocol. Have you guys care for roughly care for checkbox one after which and I scheme hold truly CTV normally is there after which or no longer it is roughly care for checkbox two which is, is this potentially the most straightforward the attach simplest is amazingly relative depending on what your priorities are, is here is potentially the most straightforward methodology to scheme this in Bitcoin? Would you agree that that’s roughly care for the honor that we’re in upright now?
[49:12] Jeremy: Yeah. I hold so and I hold slightly a few the attach that gets refined is there’s care for restricted attention and restricted time and if they’re no longer rival at a protocol stage, their rival in phrases of what folks exhaust time working on.
[49:27] Customer 4: Yeah, and so alongside these traces, one thing that has develop into slightly sure in all places in the final couple of months of debate is on a roughly what capabilities scheme we hold are most treasured for covenants to enable? It seems care for there’s care for frequent consensus being an overloaded word, but frequent settlement no lower than that the 2 styles of capabilities are vaults after which charge swimming pools. CTV does these both shapely, there’s working code for both of them in CPO, but I scheme hold we now earn released– that has efficiently been shifted to the attach or no longer it is care for covenants are factual. It’s k to desire covenants. And CTV is a non-irascible methodology to scheme covenants. Correct? And now we now earn got, I hold this new third thing, which is the covenant that we launched will earn to assemble truly factual vaults and if truth be told factual charge swimming pools, upright? I hold that’s roughly care for potentially the most up-to-date impart, which is to be beautiful, worlds farther. We scheme no longer earn any of that settlement a yr prior to now, upright? So, the conversation has been moved slightly slightly, which I hold is expansive.
[50:40] [ads]
[51:29] Impress: I desired to quiz a ask. Correct after we’re talking about care for point one among – we’re agreeing that CTV would now not motive any hurt. I hold this has been answered and in my rudimentary view of it upright now, here is one among the things that I’ve particularly no longer saved up with the least bit. Covenants and CTV lately is trusty roughly been this extensive blank home for me. The one thing that I truly feel care for slightly a few the conversations on Twitter about covenants were, is this view of encumbering folks’s addresses? Love there used to be a tweet this day or one thing, any individual used to be asserting, oh, there is a brand new law and the authorities says that, you had been handiest going to earn the ability to reset Bitcoin–
[52:16] Jeremy: That’s no longer imaginable. That’s trusty no longer imaginable with CTV. You would possibly per chance presumably well presumably with other covenants, but no longer CTV.
[52:25] Impress: Yeah, I mean, I hold or no longer it is miles a terminology declare.
[52:32] Jeremy: Particularly even though the distinguishing between the instance, because of folks had been asserting, oh, you are going to procure a scheme to trusty require that you have got got care for a authorities multisig or with out reference to. It’s care for, effectively, no shit. You received a law that stated any dreary thing, upright? And it seems care for here is clearly will earn to be the case but when I give them my take care of that I generated from my keys and my wallet with with out reference to script I wished and gives it to them, it would no longer be encumbered with another CTV restriction. It’s trusty my take care of and my preserve a watch on, honest? In the event that they agreed to withdraw to it.
[53:14] Casey: Yeah, whereas you give any individual an take care of–
[53:16] Jeremy: That’s already encumbered with every thing, upright?
[53:17] Casey: Yeah. Exactly. That take care of encodes or commits to the Bitcoin script that would possibly per chance exhaust these cash. To permit them to no longer pay you to that take care of with out the exhaust of your script, that methodology that you specify, that methodology they can no longer stick OP_CTV in there with out making it truly paying to a distinct take care of which is never any longer the take care of you gave them. In that case, be sending you the cash.
[53:46] Impress: It didn’t seem care for that is more seemingly to earn the ability to be the case, trusty on my view of that, but because of I didn’t slightly know, I didn’t truly imprint how a covenant would work any methodology that you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably encumber things later down the road. I was admittedly care for slightly of bit, care for, “Nevertheless how?”
[54:03] Jeremy: Also, I hold, here’s what slightly a few the plebs, presumably, scheme no longer earn, is that they hold that they’ve formed a stable anti-consensus space with the technical consensus committee bureau or with out reference to, care for, oh, CTV is never any longer the thing but I hold what’s no longer truly being realized or no lower than care for clearly outlined is that the explanation why frequent pleb kind are care for, “Let’s no longer shuffle this thing in. Let’s hold about it more,” is precisely because of there is a trouble about introducing every one among these truly refined refined things which earn an enormous social anxiousness for what Bitcoin will search for care for. And then practically universally, there is technical consensus amongst the technical wizards that we will earn to earn rotund-blown, pie-in-the-sky covenants. It’s trusty a subject of time except we procure the person that we care for ample to recommend.
And I hold that folks scheme no longer essentially glimpse the storm brewing around that ask that it is no longer one thing as a ways as I will suppose talking to so much, slightly a few Bitcoin customers is desired. Of us desire Bitcoin to be the sound cash, strongest store of cost imaginable. They scheme no longer care about having every imaginable fucking utility. What they scheme care about is having sound cash and having a scale to the largest quantity of folks imaginable with out violating the soundness of the system. And that is the explanation truly the attach one thing care for CTV and there are other chances for things that can luxuriate in in gaps care for that. It’s a waypoint of no longer introducing practically anything else more than is already imaginable this day with the worst have faith assumptions, but aloof doing one thing slightly priceless that’s care for a covenant.
Anything more, you scheme initiate coming into into the territory that you is more seemingly to be talking about. And or no longer it is miles a flowery commerce-off home, but I scheme no longer hold folks know why they observe disagree over CTV. I scheme no longer hold they imprint that the methodology that the core model process or with out reference to technical consensus process is leading is into one thing that’s unparalleled, unparalleled, unparalleled more refined and has every one among these unfavorable commerce-offs for care for the what’s Bitcoin ask. Bitcoin is aloof going to sail looking out for care for Bitcoin with CTV but these other things will most seemingly be a truly a model of earn of system.
[56:19] Shinobi: To translate that to pleb precise fleet, somebody shy about uncommon shit care for the authorities forcing cash into some magic script the attach the authorities has to signal off on every thing, and these cash can by no methodology destroy out that, it is completely no longer possible for CTV to scheme that. All of the developers arguing towards CTV are no longer arguing towards CTV to lead clear of things care for that. They are arguing towards CTV because of they need more refined covenants that movement nearer and nearer to things care for that being imaginable. Now, that would now not mean that every other covenant proposal in the market enables things care for that, but that is the course that technical developers have to sail is nearer to things care for that being imaginable.
[57:18] Jeremy: And the methodology that we in overall handled this roughly controversy prior to now with Bitcoin is by being patient. If ample folks have to sail looking out for at other stuff and glimpse the scheme in which it compares or with out reference to, care for the thing that solves that is time, and one among the finest things I am listening to, and one among the finest reasons there’s controversy is never any longer because of I am listening to somebody converse, care for, ” what, screw CTV, we desire this as an quite quite loads of.” I am no longer truly listening to that. What I am listening to is de facto, “We desire time so as that folks can preserve in thoughts other things and CTV itself as effectively.”
I mean, positive, CTV is solid, and slightly unparalleled everybody has the same opinion CTV is solid however the thing that I hear folks are asserting so much is they if truth be told feel care for we’d like more time in frequent, even at frequent plebs. We trusty received Taproot. It’s so short and you have faith you studied, effectively, who cares? Love logically whereas you is more seemingly to be trusty being logical, who cares? It’s factual. Of us care for it. It’s no longer unstable technically. Let’s trusty scheme it. Who cares that ?or no longer it is no longer been a truly prolonged time. I hold folks scheme care. And I hold it issues.
[58:14] Casey: The complexity of other solutions and the simplicity of OP_CTV. No longer one among the other things which had been proposed or are earn of belief to be as quite quite loads of covenants earn the unattainable bang-for-buck ratio of OP_CTV. OP_CTV is trusty so straightforward. It’s care for caveman abilities and I mean that care for in potentially the most straightforward imaginable methodology. It has boundaries, but every thing that’s earn of more versatile, winds up, being methodology, methodology, methodology, methodology, methodology more refined. I hold even supposing any individual came up with a more featureful covenant proposal, I hold there is a factual likelihood that I’d aloof desire to moreover earn OP_CTV so as that I would possibly per chance presumably well presumably disappear for that unattainable simplicity when I didn’t need these more featureful things of with out reference to, some arbitrary future coming that map can provide.
And that, I hold is an argument towards why or no longer it is no longer care for the earn of trusty wait and glimpse argument, is never any longer trim compelling for me. It’s that, yeah, presumably any individual will advance up with one thing, any individual else after slightly a few model. Nevertheless that thing will with out a doubt be methodology more refined than OP_CTV.
[59:28] Shinobi: Let me, truly fleet, to acknowledge what Casey used to be asserting. Bitcoin altering is threading a needle. Yes, switch will earn to be approached cautiously, things will earn to be analyzed completely, and things must always not ever trusty be achieved whimsically, but trusty search for at pay to script hash, CLTV, and how swiftly and with out problems these adjustments went via versus things care for SUG would, care for Taproot. Bitcoin is growing. It’s getting bigger. And the larger it grows, the more refined, the more time-inviting, the more friction there will most seemingly be to adjustments. And or no longer it is trusty a straightforward actuality upright now. Bitcoin as it is also can no longer be a self-sovereign cash for folks on this planet. It would now not scale. It will no longer scheme that procedure as Bitcoin is upright now that is a pipe dream and we will glimpse how the prognosis from 2010 play out if it iced over upright here, upright now.
Everybody’s going to be the exhaust of banks. No one’s going to be self-custodying their possess cash, no person is going to earn the freedom that that ability affords. So or no longer it is threading the needle, or no longer it is discovering the steadiness between these two things. We desire to formulation switch cautiously and if fact be told hold it via, but we cannot trusty take a seat here on our asses and pretend care for we can trusty wait eternally. Because that day if Bitcoin is going to work will advance the attach or no longer it is trusty no longer temperamental anymore. And if it is no longer scalable ample, by the point that day comes, then we’re no longer going to earn self-sovereign cash for folks. That’s no longer going to happen.
[61:21] Casey: I truly scheme no longer care about care for the final five percent of folks, I am gonna aloof procure a scheme to exhaust Bitcoin exactly the methodology it is eternally.
[61:30] Shinobi: No, you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably no longer, Casey. That’s a fucking delusional pipe dream.
[61:33] Marshall: So, as a man who tried to, I converse you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably name it core rating in my old existence would build it slightly a classic. I could suppose you my optics are these – folks gave the same, oh, we’d like to wait. It’s care for impossibly more refined and it received in because of Peter Wool used to be a homey of everybody else. Jeremy has pissed on slightly a few folks. He’s pissed slightly a few folks off because of that’s trusty how the event community works. Whereas you earn committee earn admission to and you is more seemingly to be no longer in the Homeboy Network, or no longer it is trusty so much more challenging for you to earn shit via. CLTV by Greg and Peter, they’re in the Homeboy Network, or no longer it is more straightforward to earn shit via. That’s trusty the personality of Open Offer Construction, Bitcoin, Linux, with out reference to. Actually, here is more roughly developers bitching and pissing on every instead of anything else no topic the facade of, oh, or no longer it is too complex or, oh, we’d like more time. That is the fact as I glimpse it.
I hold the code is expansive. It has been entirely audited. Jeremy has put the cash the attach his mouth is, no person’s claim the bounty. No one truly has shit to claim. The excuse of, oh, we trusty received Taproot. You received Taproot as a result of miners had been fucking being attentive. Extra recurrently than no longer, we’re asleep on the wheel. I mean, let’s be just appropriate. That being stated, care for, that’s no longer a factual motive to no longer scheme one thing, and Jeremy and I talked so much about this and or no longer it is as much as him to self-market. And that is the explanation a extensive share of what this room’s about.
And so personally, as my history in Bitcoin, or no longer it is more about who likes you and the commit list and who would now not much like you. That’s trusty roughly the politics as I glimpse it.
[63:18] Impress: Yeah, I hold that’s a factual space. I am no longer going to shut it out. I need another 25 minutes for questions from the viewers. So if the speakers on stage scheme no longer thoughts, I will initiate pulling folks up. Strive to construct it temporary, quiz your ask, preserve it on topic about CTV, after which we will earn the participants on stage talk about it.
[63:35] Guy Swann: Can I converse one thing precise fleet?
[63:37] Impress: Yeah, sail forward, Guy.
[63:39] Guy: In the fact of its controversy, I truly hold the motive that’s drummed up so unparalleled controversy, no longer particularly in the developer community, but trusty because of trusty in the pleb and Twitter in frequent, is that no person knows what the hell it is. Love I aloof hold care for we trusty barely– I mean how decades truly did we exhaust trusty explaining the basics of Taproot and CTV, there’s been hundreds talks of covenants and stuff care for the dev list and stuff care for when I battle via all that, but even I earn trusty been roughly brushing over it because of there’s trusty so unparalleled of the other shit to sail over. And so, what used to be a truly frequent ask used to be one thing that I truly didn’t know. And the no longer very, very naive assumption of when any individual says, oh, you are going to procure a scheme to encumber extra transactions in the prolonged shuffle with what it would scheme, sounds care for it is recurrently a inferior thing. So, I hold slightly a few it is trusty no person knows what the hell’s going on.
Generally, everybody’s ignorant and no person’s received any time to quilt all these items other than for the of us that scheme this all rattling day.
[64:47] Jeremy: So, I hold one thing I trusty have to add is that when I designed CTV, I actually designed it with that declare in thoughts, so I wasn’t placing one thing out to then overview towards, oh, scheme we scheme factual ample for this? That used to be actually what I had in thoughts. Of us scheme no longer desire covenants for this motive let me build one thing. And that’s explanation why or no longer it is earn of, in slightly of bit of a uncommon space. And then in phrases of timeline, care for CTV specification used to be accomplished 9 months earlier than Taproot’s spec used to be accomplished and the code has been achieved since then as effectively. And slightly a few why it used to be no longer more in the overall public inspect for the final whereas used to be folks, roughly, I am no longer going to claim the word ‘threatened’ but roughly put slightly a few power on me that if I talked about CTV too unparalleled earlier than Taproot received achieved that I was going to destabilize the technique that would lead to Taproot. It used to be going to be on my aid that Taproot failed to earn via.
So, I take a seat down, shut up, I didn’t build complaints that I desired to construct about Taproot and I helped earn Taproot activated, so as that then, I’d converse, k, now I will work on CTV. Now, folks turn around and converse, “Thanks on your entire aid, Motherfucker, earn out of here, earn away alongside with your thing.” And or no longer it is care for, “Dude, I actually trusty enable you to earn your things via so as that I would possibly per chance presumably well presumably care for aid earn this thing via care for, k.” And they’re care for, oh, but now the bar will earn to be even better. I am care for, all upright, chill, I could designate you more work. I could designate you more work merchandise. I could build it higher. I am k with all that, but I hold folks trusty scheme no longer truly perceive what the precise process has been from my perspective, which is slightly freaking dysfunctional.
[66:22] Impress: Evidently. Hudson had his hand up a truly prolonged time prior to now first and principal of this. So I trusty desired to construct positive you received a likelihood to discuss there, brother.
[66:30] Hudson: Thanks so unparalleled. Yeah, so, I am Hudson. I could scheme a temporary ask. And rarely, my background is I did some politics stuff in shaded coin used to be roughly early Bitcoin but no longer trim obsessed on the dev on the time because of I was in faculty after which did Ethereum EIP, which is care for BIP but for Ethereum, I was the lead editor.
[66:48] Customer 5: Hudson, can you discuss trusty about Bitcoin, no other cash, please. Thanks.
[66:52] Impress: No, dangle on, let him discuss. Here’s a truly respected person that’s sharing wisdom and I have to be taught anything else that he has to share.
[66:59] Hudson: Yes. I am no longer about to overview even though. Here is more trusty I truly realized from the BIP process and stuff. So, that’s why I was here. Nevertheless, yeah, I imprint. I entirely earn it. So, yeah, infrequently from taking a gaze at Leekens’ most up-to-date thread the attach they roughly talked about, hey, what’s going on with CTV? A range of what I saw had been of us that had been semi-prominent within the Bitcoin Construction Community roughly shitting on Jeremy and I looked into that slightly of bit more, and what truly afflicted me about that used to be that, used to be trusty care for Marshall stated. What Marshall stated earlier is de facto the summary of what I am about to claim, which is care for or no longer it is care for an Insider’s Club. Love if they’ll suppose Jeremy that they’re no longer doing the upright process or they broke some unspoken rule, why cannot Luke Stride Jr. build an quite quite loads of Taproot implementation they push out broadly after which search info from that to sail k and aloof earn all these very high-stage accesses to earn hub repos they’ve had for years.
It’s care for they care for shush the crazy person, and trusty let him scheme his thing because of they scheme no longer will earn to be political or motive battle. Nevertheless as prolonged as folks care for Luke and others who are problematic within Bitcoin or allowed to earn that stage of management, that’s roughly a symptom of a bigger root mission of an absence of accountability, an absence of process for the methodology to earn these items achieved. So, that’s trusty roughly what I was thinking on that. Nevertheless who else has a commentary particularly or no longer it is more into Bitcoin because of why is this going on?
[68:22] Ryan Gentry: I mean, Hudson, I’d no longer converse exactly from my point of stare that or no longer it is care for the Weak Boys’ Club and you is more seemingly to be trusty in the membership or no longer. I’d trusty converse or no longer it is more of a fabricated from things getting bigger, the stakes getting bigger, and folks being more paranoid, more skeptical, and trusty more analytical of folks becoming concerned. Love, I scheme no longer glimpse this as care for an Weak Boys Club that you is more seemingly to be either a member of or no longer. I trusty glimpse this as having gotten to the point the attach the stage of have faith and appreciate amongst a model of groups or a model of participants on this neighborhood who even, with that appreciate and that have faith there, aloof are very animus between every other now and then and if truth be told earn into it. It trusty takes time to create that roughly have faith. And I hold the larger Bitcoin gets, the more time that’s going to bewitch because of folks are going to be more skeptical, more paranoid as a result of stakes preserve getting bigger.
[69:34] Customer 5: Ryan, that’s no longer upright. Jeremy has been a core dev for longer than rattling as regards to somebody else. That’s no longer upright. That’s trusty no longer upright.
[69:41] Hudson: Effectively, I converse the other thing is care for, even, you are going to procure a scheme to search for on the analytics of it. Love, yeah, Jeremy’s had commenced for a whereas, has had factual code, by no methodology achieved anything else malicious, but moreover care for from the Bitcoin devs that I hear about care for they’ll be in groups of folks from a model of cryptos and check with them and be care for, “Yeah, I earn this view, so and so,” it is miles more seemingly to be either anti-Bitcoin, it is miles more seemingly to be pro another crypto, nd then they’ll converse care for, “Nevertheless scheme no longer point out that I stated this,” and or no longer it is roughly care for in a vein of care for, effectively, wait, why? And or no longer it is care for, “Effectively, I will’t converse that on Twitter because of then I could be outed. I could be outcast.”
[70:14] Ryan: Yeah, I scheme no longer know. It’s extensive for the first visitor to raise up but, in frequent, I hold Luke has achieved a ton of expansive work for Bitcoin. He’s broadly belief to be one among the devs that understands the system potentially the most straightforward and if truth be told interestingly, it seems slightly a few the rebuttals or slightly a few the provision of potentially the most up-to-date controversy is truly, folks disagreeing the swiftly trial as a technique that we will earn to push via upgrades, which used to be Luke’s situation to initiate with, which I hold is slightly involving. So, Bitcoin is unquestionably very a model of than Ethereum. We earn our ways of doing so. Can they be improved? Love, pointless to converse, is our logic in the aid of the methodology, things are, positive.
[70:57] Hudson: That’s a expansive acknowledge. Because, yeah, I infrequently clearly, I am gonna earn care for, the worst ingredients of the drama with that so as that’s a truly factual acknowledge. I adore the perspective there and except there’s anything else for me, I could soar off and gives my speakers lot to any individual else with factual questions as effectively.
[71:11] Impress: Thanks, Hudson. Yep. I adore the ask. I am gonna reorganize a few of the speakers. So, if I knock you down, sorry about that, but I am citing folks for questions.
[71:22] Casey: I mean, trusty in regards to, roughly, jumping off that final share, scheme we hold there’s been any bad precedent space in the methodology BIP-119 has been proposed with swiftly trial? Does somebody bewitch that situation?
[71:41] Impress: I am of the precise same view as Luke. That swiftly trial is a mistake. Jeremy, I stated, UASF, I didn’t converse swiftly trial. I stated when UASF. I scheme no longer care for the view of Bitcoin core or miners or any longer tangibly definable neighborhood being as much as bustle of the activation mechanism for proposals. I hold that begins to earn political, I hold that begins to movement in the course the attach a more and more identifiable neighborhood is perceived as being as much as bustle of that, and I hold that core particularly and miners will earn to earn no mumble feature in it, I hold things will earn to be achieved with UASF. I scheme no longer hold core will earn to be doing anything else but writing the validation logic for things. I hold activation deployments will earn to advance from someplace else. I scheme no longer hold that miners will earn to earn a veto or an ability to motive one thing to spark off or no longer. I hold that customers will earn to be working activation logic and there is either ample of them to stable-arm everybody else alongside to the point that miners spark off because of they scheme no longer have to peek their backside line hurt to the point that core flips things on in the following release because of one thing else activated it after their preliminary release with the validation logic.
I scheme no longer hold that these definable identifiable groups will earn to earn anything else to scheme with that. I hold that would space the road of capturable processes that would possibly per chance additionally be primitive maliciously.
[73:29] Jeremy: I scheme no longer disagree with that. I mean, I hold whereas you glimpse and read the post that I put out, I actually converse, folks quiz me for AUSF and I’ve already dedicated myself that I am no longer going to lead any AUSF process because of I moreover scheme no longer hold that a dev will earn to lead AUSF either. And what I converse is, search for, I am placing out a shopper that can scheme this. It’s truly as much as the community to mirror if here is the shopper that is the upright one for them. And I converse when the ask gets requested of care for, is there a mission with the technique by which I rolled this out? The ask truly is – what did I roll out? I rolled out a weblog post with hyperlinks to software program folks would possibly per chance presumably well presumably create. I didn’t sail and converse, “It’s a have to to shuffle this.” I didn’t misrepresent what the motion-response or anything else would possibly per chance presumably well presumably be, or no longer it is care for, “Scrutinize, here is software program. If here is the software program that you truly desire that you have faith you studied folks will earn to shuffle, scheme it.”
I even converse you are going to earn to earn precise loud and suppose folks why they must always not shuffle this. And I hold the attach or no longer it is been pleasing to me is folks haven’t truly read that I was interesting them to shoot it down. And then they’re getting very personally aggressive in direction of me, in wish to trusty care for civilly asserting, we must always not scheme the proposal that you put out which I was clearly very open for that feedback. And now I hold in phrases of AUSF, it is more sure that that is the thing that must happen if there’s one thing for CTV, I am a man of my word, so I am no longer going to lead the cost there, but I am no longer moreover no longer going to be care for sitting on somebody who’s trying to scheme that.
[74:52] Ryan: Big temporary word of clarification, Impress. I’d converse, care for Jeremy trusty stated, BIP-119 on this most up-to-date controversy is trusty following the technique that works for the final software program. So, if there used to be any troubling precedent sent, it used to be space with Taproot no longer with what’s going on upright now.
[75:09] Impress: Correct to be trim sure, Ryan and Jeremy, I entirely have faith you. I am trusty earn of playing I converse slightly of bit of devil’s recommend and earn of trusty answering the questions I earn from the crowd. I truly had any individual trusty messaged me about what are the cons of this mission? So, there’s with out a doubt slightly a few folks talking about slightly a few these items and that’s the explanation the supreme explanation why I brought it up that methodology. I am no longer trying to border this swiftly trial or anything else going on here as anyway bad or malicious, more trusty bringing it up for the sake of debate.
[75:44] Customer 6: Valid fleet commentary, or no longer it is factual that, Impress, you brought this up that we will earn to be cautious. I mean, or no longer it is miles slightly of a hedging language there. The finest takeaway for me out of this entire saga, personally, used to be that one has to be extraordinarily cautious in regards to the language that they exhaust and this entire fight in regards to the technique and with out reference to, upright? It’s very well-known. Love slightly a few folks in their minds, they’ve totally at a loss for words the proposal itself with the proposal on the formulation to spark off it. It does very two a model of things, nothing to scheme with every other the least bit. Nevertheless this goes deeper, upright? I mean, we will earn to be extraordinarily mindful of the language that we exhaust but even that comes the total formulation down to single words care for one Shinobi used to be talking and trusty have to let Jeremy build his commentary. We turned, in some sense, very unparalleled a model of. The sense of the field to the core. And even the word itself, it conjures up a definite truly feel that there’s some roughly a center of the universe there or one thing, upright?
The sacred GitHub repo that or no longer it is by some capability, I scheme no longer know, it defines everybody’s existence. Now, or no longer it is miles a thousand billion buck thing and or no longer it is care for I scheme no longer know, we will earn to care for a create a pedestal and a monument there and, pointless to converse, everybody’s respected and or no longer it is arduous-working folks and all and they deserve the credit ranking. Nevertheless I hold it used to be extraordinarily uncomfortable that it used to be renamed. It primitive to be trusty called Bitcoin shopper, and in some unspecified time in the future, it used to be renamed to Core and I hold that truly, that used to be a truly inferior movement. On this foundation, I will build a proposal that we will earn to rename it to Bitcoin Stride Middle of Universe, I persistently check with it as such so as that everybody knows the guts of the universe is there and that nothing else can presumably advance from wherever else.
This earn of language in the supposedly centralized system, I hold will also be profoundly adversarial and when folks scheme no longer know unparalleled about anything else they hear Core, they hold, oh, effectively, that is what it has to advance aid from. Needless to converse, that is the Core, upright? And seems care for terribly logical but that’s trusty the word, that would now not truly mean anything else. Correct the core of the software program and the preliminary motivation used to be because of we’re going to separate the community share from the wallet share, which by no methodology truly took situation. Nevertheless we caught with the name and I hold we amplified slightly a few drama, I hold, in many folks’s minds.
[78:08] Impress: Yeah. I hold the following ask went to Tao after which The Final Airbender except, Tao, you scheme no longer earn anything else then The Final Airbender.
[78:15] Tao: No, truly, I scheme earn one thing. Thanks for bringing me up. Correct talking from a pleb’s perspective, I am trusty a weird and wonderful pleb, received into Bitcoin a whereas aid but I scheme have to give my opinions and what I am seeing. So, what we desire truly, is this sound cash, a few of the core tips that everybody knows, self-sovereignty. No one can fuck with the cash. And then moreover, one among the things that I stare is this – I scheme no longer hold or no longer it is factual to initiate implementing new beneficial properties. Reasons why I converse that is never any longer that or no longer it is no longer one thing that would possibly per chance additionally be achieved in the prolonged shuffle but with out a doubt no longer at potentially the most up-to-date impart. Reasons why is because of most folk, most plebs are aloof trusty catching as much as be taught every thing that Bitcoin has for the time being as it stands. This, on top of the many folks on this planet who scheme no longer even be taught about Bitcoin. So it is no longer well-known to add new beneficial properties for the time being.
What we will earn to scheme or what, I hold, the energy will earn to be put into is what Shinobi talked about earlier and that’s the scalability of the system, upright? The scalability is informed that in some unspecified time in the future because of we know that would possibly per chance advance, meaning, we know there will most seemingly be more and more adoption and as that advance, we’re going to have to meet and procure a scheme to enhance that earn of scalability and adoption. So, the energy truly will earn to fret in that and no longer essentially in conjunction with this option, or that feature, or with out reference to feature because of folks scheme no longer even be taught about your entire most up-to-date beneficial properties upright now. I am trusty talking from a pleb’s perspective, so, thanks very unparalleled.
[80:04] The Final Airbender: I hold Tao had a expansive point in phrases of making positive that the scalability is improved and remains to be improved for everybody who are customers of Bitcoin and I care for that view. I moreover care for the view that switch care for every switch in the system wants to be integrated in a scheme that impacts and it takes review of your entire customers of the product, care for on this case, the Bitcoin. Nevertheless on this dialogue, on this topic, what I were seeing, no lower than I’ve been studying on Twitter in regards to the swiftly trial handiest activating is the miner’s desire and miners, pointless to converse, one among the principal events, your entire thing. Love I hold I saw a video from Antonopoulos. I am forgetting his name, the upright pronunciation.
[80:55] Impress: Andreas.
[80:56] The Final Airbender: Yeah, Andreas. So, he has a commentary about potentially this view that is never any longer incorporating your entire customers, the wallet makers, the exhibit makers, and in here care for a pleasant chart that he created in a presentation on which I hold, [inaudible] picked up and another person moreover picked up. The questions had been that the swiftly trials applied to the old case of this Taproot. It will also just no longer be the upright view because of it would now not involve your entire stakeholders and that’s the explanation a ask I earn for us because of I am actually new to the view of creating for Bitcoin. I’ve been hoarding Bitcoin for slightly a whereas but no longer actively taking a gaze at GitHub repo and things of that nature because of I was doing other things. Nevertheless now I will center of attention more my attention on this view of truly establishing the product and making my contributions going forward.
The context that I’d desire to quiz all of us, all of you who are listening, is this view of getting a swiftly trial handiest the miners earn to mirror is one thing that I hold I wondered that view because of it would now not signify me because of I am no longer a miner. So, how scheme I earn fervent?
[82:14] Jeremy: I hold, if I will trusty acknowledge truly swiftly, one miner scheme normally observe what’s going on on this planet and what folks are asserting in public sentiment. And no lower than ten percent of them scheme or 11% and if no lower than eleven percent of them are doing that, there will not be any methodology that one thing can spark off below a swiftly trial as prolonged as you is more seemingly to be no longer assuming any individual’s going to care for reorg the chain, by which case, or no longer it is care for, 51% of that. The opposite side to that, too, that’s well-known to construct in thoughts is you with out a doubt scheme earn ways based mostly entirely on the signalling mechanism to no longer be on that chain if it occurs and you’ve got a extensive menace of customers to scheme person-resisted at ease work. And I moreover wrote the code for that, in case that’s one thing that folks desire that conceptually does work.
And then, I hold, earn of as the final bit of care for trusty the attach there’s so much to be taught about slightly a few things and what’s going on with these items, earn they been studied or with out reference to. Generally, or no longer it is truly arduous to clutch about every thing going on and whereas you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably like to claim, effectively, what’s the massive space of of us which had been fervent? I put together the placement, utxo.org/indicators and I believe that that bewitch is a unparalleled broader breadth of the industry and of folks in the industry, and when I converse industry, I trusty mean of us that care for Bitcoin then used to be accessible as indexing of sentiment then we had for anything else care for Taproot the attach or no longer it is no longer truly sure what the measurable criteria used to be after we stated Taproot has consensus care for no person’s been in a position to point me to care for a grunt thing. That’s care for, oh, positive, or no longer it is sure. The supreme thing any individual has been in a position to point me to for Taproot used to be an index of miners who stated they would increase it and I’ve no longer been in a position to peek an inventory of companies that stated they have to enhance it, as an illustration.
[84:04] The Final Airbender: Thanks, Jeremy. I’d desire to earn one observe-up ask, which is – in the prolonged shuffle if there is a switch that is will earn to be proposed and wants to be merged into the master branch on our GitHub repository, what would that branch be that I have to create myself and shuffle it care for a exhibit to construct positive that I signify my vote? How would I opt that branch? Is there a process care for that, converse, I desire to claim this switch is going to be urged to sail forward, let me earn that branch imprint, create my possess node, shuffle that node to suppose my vote, whether I increase or whether I scheme no longer increase, how is the technique for that? What is that process? Or what’s going to earn to that process be if there is any, and if no longer, please educate me.
[84:49] Jeremy: What you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably like to shuffle and what occurs occurs. It’s the mob. Love, that’s trusty how that works. There is never any longer this type of thing as a process there. You build your quite quite loads of. Everybody makes their particular person quite quite loads of after which what occurs, occurs.
[85:06] The Final Airbender: So, is there a process that would possibly per chance additionally be integrated to aid folks build a decision? Yes, or no? ABC? What are the choices accessible to construct a model of branches or determined they can desire? Is there a exhaust for slightly of technical customers for them to earn the ability to create on their possess after which suppose their desire by working that model of node?
[85:27] Jeremy: You be taught or you choose folks to have faith, these are your decisions.
[85:32] The Final Airbender: I hold that’s beautiful ample. So, infrequently you is more seemingly to be suggesting I build my possess, scheme it myself.
[85:40] Jeremy: Effectively, I truly did that all over Taproot activation. I’ve labored my possess custom shopper and commenced implementing Taproot from the Genesis block, and a few giant asshole, [inaudible] attacked the Bitcoin Network and stalled my node for the the leisure of eternity.
[86:01] Impress: I was trusty about to raise that up whereas you received forked up. Effectively, I desired to thank everybody. We’re hitting our 7: 00 here and that’s the explanation trusty about our cutoff time here. I desired to thank Casey so unparalleled for joining from the earn-sail and roughly going via the basics. I hold we can all agree there’s trusty unparalleled more to talk about and earn of imprint in regards to the technique and particularly Jeremy’s proposal. And clearly, pointless to converse, I have to thank Jeremy for all of your energy and being so accessible and prepared to talk about all these items. Thanks everybody else for putting out as persistently. Bitcoin Magazine, overview us out. Thanks, Chris, for web hosting. Chris, earn we received another shows establishing you would possibly per chance presumably well presumably like to talk about?
[86:41] Chris Alaimo: No, no longer upright at this minute. Thanks on your entire speakers. Thanks, Jeremy. Thanks, Shinobi. We are going to desire to scheme this again sometime. I apologize we didn’t earn to your entire questions but thanks, guys, for popping out. And, Impress, you received anything else or Q?
[86:57] Jeremy: Can I build a temporary closing commentary?
[86:58] Impress: Yes. I was going to claim, yep.
[87:02] Jeremy: Yeah, I mean, all that I have to claim to everybody is that here is the work, one among my predominant mantras, and what that methodology is care for of us earn truly pressured out out and they’re care for, “Oh, no.” Nevertheless or no longer it is care for, hey, we’re in a frequent mission that we’re trying to construct higher cash for humankind and with out reference to we’re doing, here is an a part of the work, share of that process, answering these questions, figuring it out. Here is the work and or no longer it is all going to be factual. We’re doing our simplest, everybody, and overview out to no longer care for harbor too unparalleled grudge or detest. Of us are trusty advocating for what they hold in and trusty build higher arguments. That’s earn of what it comes the total formulation down to is, effectively, that’s how this will evolve to be potentially the most straightforward ecosystem and potentially the most straightforward cash system is care for of us making vociferous debate and difficult on and care for accepting losses, taking wins, that is what or no longer it is all about.
[87:54] Impress: Sleek. And on that, thanks so unparalleled, Jeremy, everybody, earn a pleasant initiate to the week and we will glimpse you subsequent time.
[88:00] Shinobi: Peace.
[end]
