“Biomimicry is innovation impressed by nature. In a society accustomed to dominating or ‘bettering’ nature, this respectful imitation is a radically unique method, a revolution in actuality. Unlike the Industrial Revolution, the Biomimicry Revolution introduces an technology based mostly not on what we can extract from nature, but on what we can learn from her.” — Janine Benyus
The put we’re headed appears to be like extra worthy than perchance notion how we got right here. As a consequence of history is our trainer and could insist how we buy to cocreate our future, we must pay homage to our previous. The early web become about connecting machines to machines, and the early digital engineers in social media and gaming realized they wished a machine-to-human invent prototype, one which interfaced their digital constraints with human engagement. Given their industrial-technology legacy thinking and proclivity in direction of skeuomorphism (conserving an veteran invent on high of a novel technology), this unique interface inevitably wished to by hook or by crook involve the size of person behavioral outcomes to “validate” what they constructed. Nonetheless how?
The mid-1900s, psychologist B. F. Skinner’s behaviorist theory of “operant conditioning” came to their rescue. This methodology of psychological behavioral conditioning equipped an practically seamless match with their digital boundaries. The engineers’ binary computations also can now mix behaviorist operant conditioning as the premise of a machine-human interface, and human behavioral outcomes would be designed to be objectively measurable. A broad income further accumulated when the engineers and firm management soon learned that the thinking and behavioral outcomes amongst immense swaths of populations would be manipulated and “managed” as effectively. Then again, this become not with out repercussions. We now look Fb and other social media corporations hauled into congressional hearings answering for his or her engagement invent and its favorite social and behavioral manipulation. In the meantime, billion-dollar, class-motion court docket cases maintain been filed in opposition to gaming corporations claiming “addictive invent.” I post that we want to deeply quiz whether or not this centralized digital invent for mental and behavioral manipulation, or one thing an identical, is what we elect overlaid on the unique decentralized Bitcoin protocol.
“It is most likely you’ll be in a arena to’t prepare what you need to presumably’t measure.” — Peter Drucker (trade management guru)
Simply acknowledged, B. F. Skinner’s “operant conditioning” is a strategy of rewards and punishments oldschool to alter behaviors (aka, habits modification) by “programming” for desired behaviors the train of exogenous reward incentives and reinforcements. It’s typically a effectively-crafted system to psychologically “bribe” the person with extrinsic incentives for desired behavioral outcomes. Whereas habits modification also can merely work effectively for the training of our pets, it can most likely decrease extremely complex and nuanced human thinking and behaviors (analog) into slim and restricted binary outcomes, when, in reality, the prosperous human situation and capability for discovering out, rising and extending comprise so worthy extra. But despite all this, B. F. Skinner’s operant conditioning theories easiest match the invent wants of the early human engagement engineers.
Operant conditioning, typically additionally recognized as “sport mechanics,” is in point of fact apt the necessary foundation of up-to-the-minute engagement invent. Therefore, folk in all our diversity and ordinary richness must currently slim and contort ourselves to adapt to digitized, standardized, industrial-age centralization. As an different, we want to flip this mannequin and empower individualized person experiences so technology adapts to, personalizes, enriches and expands every ordinary person. Every of us has the necessary correct to invent our own “self-determination.”
Unlike at the moment’s Skinnerian “sport mechanics” that permeates at the moment’s machine-human interface platforms, free, self-generated, self-motivated and self-sustained play is Mother Nature’s innate meta-invent for disintermediated legitimate engagement. Unlike gaming, legitimate play is a survival pressure, and never like gaming invent, it is non-addictive. Sport invent and most up-to-the-minute engagement invent is supposed to “hook” the person; their designers even refer to it as the “consideration financial system” and withhold in solutions (your) consideration a “scarce commodity.” Conversely, the factual legitimate player can play after which fling away as he chooses, then re-select again when he chooses. Here’s because, not like centralized sport and social media invent, legitimate engagement isn’t most effective disintermediated, but self-generated/initiated, self-motivated and self-sustained. Designing for legitimate play engagement “fixes” addictive invent and foments self-sovereignty. This aspects us in direction of the unique, personalized, person-empowered, wrong-sector invent resolution for the 21st Century.
As we fling away the predictable and relative sure bet of Newtonian industrialism and explore the quantum realms of chance, we’re with out notice recognizing the quantum world as inherently paradoxical (is it wave or particle?). We additionally now know that play and the exploration of the most likely are biologically hardwired into folk. Here’s additionally factual to varied degrees in all animals. The most in most cases-viewed YouTube movies are these of spontaneous frolicking encounters of wrong-species animal play: bears play-chasing canine, cats playfully swatting at crows, a toddler deer trusting the exploratory contact of a human toddler. Why is that? What instinctually and emotionally drives us to be taught and deeply revel in the novelty of self-generated and self-sustained play? In short, play is how we “explore the most likely” and pursue the radical. Play is self-motivated and intrinsically driven. All people is conscious of we’re on one of the best direction when nature rewards these who play with resiliency, ingenious adaptability, satisfied vitality and wholesome outcomes. As such, we must acknowledge that play offers the “first solutions” of human engagement and invent accordingly. Here’s Bitcoin’s spacious different to recreate legacy engagement invent the train of the next mannequin!
“A civilizing structure acknowledges a human pressure and corrals it into sure-sum habits, where most or all events are higher off. A decivilizing structure amplifies a human pressure in detrimental-sum ways, leaving most folk worse off. These are in most cases created unintentionally.”— Balaji S. Srinivasan (angel investor, entrepreneur)
In the 1970s, Richard Ryan and Edward Deci out of the University of Rochester collaborated to invent the “self-determination theory” on motivation. This theory confronted B. F. Skinner’s operant conditioning and frequently toppled the dominant belief that one of the best system to obtain folk to scheme projects is to reward their behaviors. These maverick researchers belief it become essential to distinguish the forms of motivation and distinguish between managed and autonomous motivation.
So, what are the elemental traits and differences between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation? This chart offers a concise, straightforward-to-mark overview:
As you need to presumably look, intrinsic motivation comes from internal and is self-motivated. It is long-lasting and self-sustaining over long sessions of time. Intrinsic motivators invent grit and domesticate self-determination. This matches with the Bitcoin ethos.
On the opposite hand, extrinsic motivation doesn’t foment long-lasting engagement. It is fueled by exogenous rewards and incentives (seductive bribes), it’s in most cases in step with size and frequently threats of punishment. Centralized fiat ethos.
Of particular expose, there exists a immense deficit that has long existed in up-to-the-minute motivational science, and we look its absence in the chart above and its omission in the research. Motivational science merely neglects to mix what we now discover out about play. The cognitive bias contained in the research and educational recordsdata vulgar precludes linking the identification and form of human intrinsic motivators to the affective neuroscience of play. I deem this oversight in the research is connected to educational bias and the historical cultural “taboo” in opposition to play expose in industrial-technology invent, e.g., “play gets in the system of work,” “it’s unproductive,” “it’s frivolous,” “play isn’t with out peril measured and has no price.”
Let’s train a little general sense and serious thinking. If play is trivial and has no price, why is it hardwired into all animals? I in actuality maintain a two-notice response to this: “Occam’s razor.” The self-organizing precept and “resolution” to human chaos and polarization and warfare sits correct below our noses. And if that isn’t sufficient, isn’t it merely satirically paradoxical that the law of parsimony comes into play thru play?
“With all issues being equal, one of the best explanation tends to be one of the best one.” — William of Ockham
If play is intermediated or managed, it is no longer legitimate play, and the wholesome beneficent outcomes of legitimate engagement are misplaced. And if play is suppressed or hijacked over time, detrimental behavioral compensations connected to play deprivation emerge, including the pervasive mental sicknesses we look at the moment.
Technology is a instrument, not a resolution.
Intrinsic motivation is the bedrock of free collection of the self-sovereign person with a wholesome inner locus of withhold a watch on. Intrinsic motivators are identified and developed thru legitimate play. Play is how folk self-arrange after we’re awake, an identical to 1 other survival pressure, sleep and desires, where we self-arrange after we’re unconscious. Our ability to self-arrange thru legitimate play engagement is the muse to self-sovereignty. It’s how we method to internally know (with out any intermediation or controlling forces) who we’re, what we fancy and what we’re correct at. Our ability to self-arrange helps us title and pursue that method and motive in our lives.
Intrinsic motivators are a must maintain to self-sustaining, non-addictive engagement behaviors. If our legitimate play engagement has been hijacked or suppressed by centralized intermediation, we don’t invent the internal locus of withhold a watch on needed to the psychologically wholesome, emancipated, self-sovereign id. Centralized programming can then swoop in and “own” us. We become narcissistic and needy, anxiously obsessed on whether or not we’re correct sufficient, if we slot in, and if now we maintain sufficient “likes,” “followers” or different kinds of external validation. We isolate and become obsessed on addictive social media and gaming. Or perchance we gravitate in direction of the perceived security and sense of belonging of polarized “crew-mediate.” Awe, despair and different kinds of mental illness are the least bit-time high crisis phases at the moment. If our “sense of self” has been narrowed, managed and validated by intermediated centralized invent and exogenous requirements, and never authored by the gargantuan form of our own legitimate selves, is it any surprise so many of us be taught to comply and slot in? It doesn’t will maintain to be this form!
“The correct dictatorship would maintain the appears to be like of a democracy, but would typically be an person with out partitions in which the prisoners would not even dream of escaping. It will most likely presumably of direction be a system of slavery where, thru consumption and leisure, the slaves would bask in their servitude.” — Aldous Huxley, 1931
Whereas at the moment’s habits modification invent depends on the extrinsic validation of size, rewards and enticements, and person engagement also can merely at the starting put seem effective, it is in general, and sadly, short-lived. Review by Ryan and Deci and others stamp extrinsic reward systems can’t present the sustained long-term engagement wished to transform human behaviors. But behaviorist operant conditioning, sadly, persists as our invent mannequin. Maybe this explains the uncomfortable engagement efficacy of up-to-the-minute gamification reward systems, the drop-off in participation, and hence the additional compensatory addictive invent suggestions. On the opposite hand, self-generated, self-motivated and self-sustained engagement is well-known to identifying what one loves to make and developing grit. This intrinsically directed engagement is additionally key to healing ourselves from mental illness disorders and detrimental behavioral compensations. Figuring out and developing intrinsic motivational drives ordinary to the person and integrating them into at the moment’s engagement invent will attend invent the mental emancipation and self-sovereign identities that become legitimate engagement into well-known, leisure work. In this kind of sort, and starting with every ordinary person, this guarantees to make the decentralized P2P creator-financial system and Renaissance 2.0 on high of Bitcoin.
It’ll not happen soon sufficient!
Source:
Here’s a guest post by Kristen Cozad. Opinions expressed are completely their own and make not necessarily mediate these of BTC, Inc. or Bitcoin Journal.
